| Europe's leading residential technology trade magazine | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
|
|
News Which.co.uk survey shows consumers confused about picture quality (8/5/2007) Flat-panel TVs are the latest must-have gadget, but people buying one are unlikely to see the great picture quality they might expect when watching standard broadcasts, warns which.co.uk today. A which.co.uk survey found that almost four in ten (38 per cent) survey respondents who don't own a flat-panel TV wrongly think that they offer much better picture quality than conventional TVs; a further one in five (18 per cent) think there is no difference.1 Only one in three (28 per cent) correctly identified that, when not watching HDTV, only the best flat-panel TVs can match the picture quality of the best traditional sets - which is in line with the research findings of which.co.uk.2 Although they have great potential for high-definition viewing, which.co.uk has had serious reservations about picture quality for normal viewing on all but the best flat- panel sets. Washed out images, colour banding and jagged edges on images are just a few of the issues people should look out for. Malcolm Coles, editor, which.co.uk, says: "There seems to be real confusion about the quality of picture you're going to see on a flat-panel TV. If people are buying them expecting better all-round picture quality, they're likely to be disappointed when it turns out to be worse. There's not a huge amount of high-definition TV being broadcast. So make sure you buy a Best Buy LCD set to avoid paying lots for a worse picture.' "We've noticed a general improvement in our latest testing, but there are still some awful sets out there so do your research before you buy - check the results of our latest tests at which.co.uk." Notes 1 In March 2007, 2,677 Which? online panel members took part in an online survey which included questions about TVs. 1,879 of the survey participants did not own a flat-panel TV. 2 We asked those members who do not own a flat-panel
TV to select the statement that best described their view on TV picture
quality for standard broadcasts. The responses were:
|
|
|
| home
| use our newsfeeds | subscribe
to newsletter | submit
a link |
advertise
| link
to us Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of all articles, advertisements and other insertions in this website, the publisher accepts no responsibility for any errors or omissions or incorrect insertions. The views of the contributors are not necessarily those of the publisher or the advertisers.
|